> Montebello said with someone who is interested in
> doing so. I am not.<
So perhaps you could explain why anyone would post something like this to a
discussion list (esp. under such a topic name) if not to allow it to be
discussed?
> The "speculative side issues" referred to above are
> NOT speculative <
You may continue to petulently deny it, but noticeably have not offered a
scrap of justification for this in the case of the flawed pronouncement
about the Italian government and the Holy See and Roman Empire.
> They are instead very significant and real
> concerns <
No, they are clearly the foundationless speculation of one guy.
I think the rest of us who read and actually understood what was being
suggested by Opoku in this case can see that contrary to what you suggest no
"Pandora's box" would in reality being opened - none that is for those
inside the law.
In this case "where the line is drawn" would be decided by the courts, which
surely is precisely how it should be... unless you think that some should be
above the law?
But that is however beyond what De Montabello "replied" in the post you
originally sent to this discussion forum, though you were not interested in
discussing it.
Paul Barford
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ancientartifacts/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ancientartifacts/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Ancientartifacts-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Ancientartifacts-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Ancientartifacts-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
