Re: [Ancientartifacts] Re: Spondylus

Paul,
 
Eventhough, I do not have to.  I'll be more than happy to work on scanning some documents.  The documentation is in my office and it was not for 11 items the misplaced bag holded a few more items on it and the documents are for all of them.
 
Take care,
 
Jorge

Paul Barford <pbarford@pro.onet.pl> wrote:
perularedo coquito writes:
> The process has been close, all my
> items are legal to sell with clean
> provenance.<
Could you clarify, were you tried and found not guilty? (Was this because
you provided the correct export documentation that you could not find at the
time of arrest?) Or did the state decide not to go ahead with a formal
indictment? These are surely two different things aren't they.

What do you as a dealer define as a "clean provenance" (as in "all" and
especially in the context of the eleven seized at the airport)? What was
their provenance?

Can you tell us where those eleven pre-columbian items are now? Can you post
a copy of their export licence here please so we can see you were unjustly
accused? Thanks.

Paul Barford



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Amazon Video

bUy dvds OnlInE