I agree with your plan. As funds are always short for digs, it would
seem a reasonable compromise to sell off duplicate items. The excess
items provide no additional information and storage costs add up.
Correct. The internet changed everything for all antiques and
collectibles. I used to collect radical political buttons until ebay.
I thought I had a very advanced colection until ebay started bringing
out material from all over the country and new collectors. Prices
soared,, they fakers moved in with fantasy pieces and the fun was
gone.
I do know that the market value of any item may be nil while its
archaeological value may be great, and that the opposite can also be
true. That is why I try to stick (now) with guys that say they are
working plowed fields or sites that they have been digging for years
and already ruined. Not being naive, I know also that they are not
going to ignore a deeper hit. Just one of the compromises I make. I
sometimes even buy at a Wal-Mart if I don't have time to go elsewhere,
sgm
--- In Ancientartifacts@yahoogroups.com, <ursa_one@...> wrote:
>
> ---- letitflyantiques1 <sgminor@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> > I may have missed your solution suggestion. What was the post?
>
> Christ knows. It's back there somewhere. Someone's gonna have my
head if they read this though....
>
> I suggested the artefacts/artifacts surplus to Museum requirements,
especially in the source country, could be sold off to interested
collectors. The funds generated could be used for archaeological
research and museum infrastructure. The items sold would have
provenance paperwork attached and any subsequent seller/buyer would
be required (by law) to provide the source country with transfer of
ownership documentation.
>
> Thus, if the item was required in the future for analysis, it could
be traced to it's present owner. I've thought about some of the
ramifications of such a proposal but I'll wait and see what you think.
>
> > I would love to deal in only items from sites that were looted
long
> > ago or from old licensed digs but I don't think there is enough
on
> > the market to satisfy demand.
>
> There's the rub, as they say.
>
> > I think every dealer and collector
> > would prefer that but where will the inventory come from? I don't
see
> > demand decreasing so all parties will benefit if reasonable and
> > flexible solutions can be found. Draconian strictures on
antiquity
> > collecting or even a total ban will never stop the trade. The
> > underground market would grow and become more ruthless and the
> > material would just disappear into secret collections.
>
> I thought the latter was the way it worked prior to the Internet?
>
> > (I get some items from old collections occasionally. A few years
ago
> > I was able to liquidate the remains of an ancient coin and
artifact
> > collection that was put together in the 1930- 1960 era and by the
> > gentleman and his father and grandfather. It was much more
> > interesting than the pieces I generally see. Still, though
> > everything was strictly legal, I am sure sites were still
destroyed
> > to get it, just long ago.)
>
> Maybe no-one's described the problem of small finds "acquisition"
for you, Steve? When they are taken from the soil there is the
possibility that this will disturb a body of other interesting
material in the vicinity. Coins can be used, in undisturbed sites, to
date other parts of the assemblage.
>
> We don't have that long a history here in Australia since
colonisation. There are laws regarding the taking of colonial and
historical artefacts yet most don't abide by them, myself included
(at times). On one side, I come from a farming family and that wheat
and sheep property is now owned by one of my cousins. They didn't
take stuff to a local rubbish tip, they had their own. The oldest
stuff on that property would be approaching 100 years in age. If I
see something interesting, and my cousin doesn't mind, I may take it
home. Not much difference, is there?
>
> But what happens? I put it in a drawer or a box and that's where it
stays. I realised a while back that unless what I found was
significant, I'd simply leave it where it was. I helped a friend with
a Clearing Sale on a rural property a few months back. She took me to
this spot where there had been an old homestead. She was picking up
stuff left, right and centre. I couldn't be bothered till I saw an
example of "Making Do" - social history jargon for making a useful
item rather than buying one. It was a large glass jar that had
acquired a crude wire handle, intact. I took it and it sits on my
bookshelf.
>
> If I was on a dig in the Middle East, I would not entertain doing
the same thing for a nanosecond.
>
> > As for my own collecting and my major business inventory, I stick
> > with antiques but even there I can't pretend I can state where a
> > piece came from or how it was acquired. When dealing with 18th
> > century furniture and smalls, there is always a pretty good
chance
> > that at least some items I handle were stolen at some point or
> > obtained by ruthless and deceitful tactics. I can attest to
recent
> > ownership but I usually can't say where an item was 25 years ago
with
> > any certainty.
>
> Yes,...but you agree that it's a different ballgame? Auctioneers
aren't always that truthful either....and they're just managing the
sale.
>
> > As a totally off topic aside, is anyone concerned about the
digging
> > of World War 1 and 2 sites?
>
> I see someone's picked up on that......digging up war graves is
going a bit far.
>
> Trevor.
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ancientartifacts/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ancientartifacts/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Ancientartifacts-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Ancientartifacts-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Ancientartifacts-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
